Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mac local installation update #4516

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: current
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

swifty99
Copy link
Contributor

Description:

I have tried a lot of different install procedures. This has been flawless since.

Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#

Checklist:

  • I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
    or

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

  • Link added in /index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.

I have tried a lot of different install procedures. This has been flawless since.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the ESPHome installation guide, specifically focusing on the Mac installation section. The changes clarify that while ESPHome supports Mac, specific installation guidance is now provided. The recommended installation method has been updated to emphasize using Homebrew, including the installation command. Additionally, the version number for testing the installation has been updated, and a new note for troubleshooting Homebrew installations has been added. The Windows and Linux sections remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
guides/installing_esphome.rst - Removed previous statement about untested Mac installation
- Updated Mac installation instructions to recommend Homebrew
- Updated version number to 2024.12.0
- Added note for troubleshooting Homebrew installation issues

Suggested Reviewers

  • jesserockz

Note: No sequence diagram is generated for this change as it primarily involves documentation updates without significant workflow modifications.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8556597 and 9a00ccf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • guides/installing_esphome.rst (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • guides/installing_esphome.rst

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
guides/installing_esphome.rst (1)

52-54: Consider adding alternative installation methods

While Homebrew is recommended, some users might prefer or require alternative installation methods. Consider adding a subsection for pip installation (similar to Windows/Linux sections) as a fallback option.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f3ce32 and 02934b4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • guides/installing_esphome.rst (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
guides/installing_esphome.rst (1)

Pattern **: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

guides/installing_esphome.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 9a00ccf
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/6764732584fbad00083329d0
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4516--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

the AI rabbit was not so bad.
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
guides/installing_esphome.rst (2)

59-63: Add error handling guidance

Consider adding common error scenarios and their solutions, similar to the Linux section.

 Verify the installation:
 .. code-block:: console
 
     $ esphome version
     Version: 2023.12.0  # Version number may vary
+
+If you get a "command not found" error, try the following:
+
+1. Ensure Homebrew's bin directory is in your PATH:
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    $ echo 'eval "$(/opt/homebrew/bin/brew shellenv)"' >> ~/.zprofile
+    $ eval "$(/opt/homebrew/bin/brew shellenv)"

65-67: Expand troubleshooting section

While linking to the Homebrew Formula page is helpful, consider adding common troubleshooting scenarios:

 If you encounter any issues with Homebrew installation, please check the
 `ESPHome Homebrew Formula <https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/esphome>`_ page
 for additional information.
+
+Common Issues:
+
+1. **Permission Issues**
+   If you encounter permission errors, ensure Homebrew is properly installed and your user has the correct permissions.
+
+2. **Dependencies**
+   If you see missing dependency errors, try:
+
+   .. code-block:: console
+
+       $ brew doctor
+       $ brew update
+       $ brew upgrade
+
+3. **Installation Conflicts**
+   If you have ESPHome installed via pip, uninstall it first:
+
+   .. code-block:: console
+
+       $ pip uninstall esphome
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 02934b4 and 8556597.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • guides/installing_esphome.rst (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
guides/installing_esphome.rst (1)

Pattern **: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

🪛 GitHub Check: build
guides/installing_esphome.rst

[failure] 56-56:
Directive 'code-block' is not followed by an empty line. Please insert an empty line after guides/installing_esphome.rst:56

🔇 Additional comments (3)
guides/installing_esphome.rst (3)

63-63: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix incorrect version number

The version number 2024.12.0 appears to be incorrect as it's beyond the current date.

-    Version: 2024.12.0  # Version number may vary
+    Version: 2023.12.0  # Version number may vary

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


54-58: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Expand Homebrew installation prerequisites

The current installation steps assume Homebrew is already installed. Consider adding prerequisite steps:

 Recommended installation is via `Homebrew <https://brew.sh/>`_:
 
+1. Install Homebrew (if not already installed):
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    $ /bin/bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/HEAD/install.sh)"
+
+2. Install ESPHome:
+
 .. code-block:: console
 
     $ brew install esphome

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: build

[failure] 56-56:
Directive 'code-block' is not followed by an empty line. Please insert an empty line after guides/installing_esphome.rst:56


52-54: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add system requirements for Mac installation

Consider adding system requirements similar to Windows and Linux sections:

  • Minimum macOS version
  • Architecture support (Intel/Apple Silicon)
  • Python version requirements
 ESPHome does support Mac & will run with no problem.
+
+System Requirements:
+- macOS 10.15 or newer
+- Both Intel and Apple Silicon Macs are supported
+- Python 3.9 or newer (installed via Homebrew)

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Comment on lines 56 to 57
.. code-block:: console
$ brew install esphome
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix RST formatting: Add empty line after code-block directive

Add an empty line after the code-block directive to comply with RST formatting rules.

 .. code-block:: console
+
     $ brew install esphome
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
.. code-block:: console
$ brew install esphome
.. code-block:: console
$ brew install esphome
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: build

[failure] 56-56:
Directive 'code-block' is not followed by an empty line. Please insert an empty line after guides/installing_esphome.rst:56

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant